Skip to main content

This video requires you to be logged in to view it.

Session Recording

Navigating open access usage data for journals and books: a discussion of use cases, challenges and opportunities Recording

Filter

In this concurrent session, panellists will discuss the challenges of retrieving open access usage data for journals and e-books. We’ll look at the use case of a publisher and a library on how they currently make use of open access usage data, and we’ll talk about standards and requirements for data exchange, and the differences between open access usage for e-books and journals.

For years, libraries have been evaluating their paywalled subscriptions by collecting usage data provided by publishers. When it comes to open access content, getting their hands on usage data is a little more difficult. On the one hand, not all usage originates from within the institution’s network – is it therefore better to look at global usage data, and not just usage associated with a specific institution? On the other hand, various versions of the same document exist and could be hosted in multiple locations. How can usage from different locations be combined? What is the OA Book Usage Data Trust, and do we need something similar for journals?

In addition, there are challenges around the granularity of the metrics provided, and if they are compliant with COUNTER standards or not. And since the content is openly available, does this mean the analytics of how the content is used should be openly available? And do they need to be governed by rules that clarify expectations of how usage data can be shared, processed and reused?

Join us for a discussion involving different stakeholders in the scholarly communications community.

In this concurrent session, panellists will discuss the challenges of retrieving open access usage data for journals and e-books. We’ll look at the use case of a publisher and a library on how they currently make use of open access usage data, and we’ll talk about standards and requirements for data exchange, and the differences between open access usage for e-books and journals.

For years, libraries have been evaluating their paywalled subscriptions by collecting usage data provided by publishers. When it comes to open access content, getting their hands on usage data is a little more difficult. On the one hand, not all usage originates from within the institution’s network – is it therefore better to look at global usage data, and not just usage associated with a specific institution? On the other hand, various versions of the same document exist and could be hosted in multiple locations. How can usage from different locations be combined? What is the OA Book Usage Data Trust, and do we need something similar for journals?

In addition, there are challenges around the granularity of the metrics provided, and if they are compliant with COUNTER standards or not. And since the content is openly available, does this mean the analytics of how the content is used should be openly available? And do they need to be governed by rules that clarify expectations of how usage data can be shared, processed and reused?

Join us for a discussion involving different stakeholders in the scholarly communications community.


Romy Beard has over 17 years' experience working in the academic online publishing. She currently works as Head of Publisher Relations at ChronosHub, a Danish Open Access management platform that works with publishers, institutions and funders to make the open access publishing process easier for authors. Romy also runs ChronosHub's monthly educational webinars that aim to bring different stakeholders in the community together for a discussion around various open-access related topics. Romy holds a First Class honours degree in English Language and Literature from the University of Glasgow, and a postgraduate M.A. in English Literature from the University of Warwick.


With two decades of scholarly publishing experience across not-for-profit and commercial publishers and publishing industry bodies, and a history of volunteering with scholarly communication bodies, I understand and appreciate the changing pressures on publishers, librarians, funders, researchers and research institutions. 


Data and standards are essential underpinnings for our community, from the metadata standards that help optimise discoverability to the usage metrics that are one aspect of measuring impact. My combined roles as COUNTER's Project Director and founder of an independent consultancy business helping publishers achieve a sustainable transition to open access both rely on that pairing of data and standards.